Propers Actes
3a jornada: Conferències 'Arquitectura en públic'
3a jornada: Conferències '...
Urbanisme Comparat: NY, Boston i Houston
Urbanisme Comparat: NY, Boston i...
Jornada tècnica 'Salubritat i seguretat als edificis...
Jornada tècnica 'Salubritat...
JORNADA DE CAMPUS PROFESSIONAL AMB TERPOLAR, A VIC
JORNADA DE CAMPUS PROFESSIONAL...
XXVIIè Torneig de Golf d'Arquitectes de Catalunya
XXVIIè Torneig de Golf d'...
Conferència de l'arquitecte Taku Sakaushi al COAC
Kazuo Shinohara, as he designed Fissure Space, wrote that although Fissure Space looks like it disconnects spaces on both sides, in fact it creates a connection between those spaces. That`s true indeed. It is normally thought that continuity between two points should be stronger with nothing in between than with something. If there is something it breaks the continuity.
But is that true? Although physically it seems true, psychologically it is not always true. It could be said that something between two spaces sometimes could work as the device which connects them.
Isn't architecture something that attains this kind of connection?
Isn't it the main role of architecture to connect people with people, people with things and things with things?